"Re W was an appeal case against a judge’s decision to reject an adoption application in favour of a special guardianship order. The Court of Appeal said the judge had failed to identify “significant errors” in social work evidence, and a “fatally flawed” welfare analysis, in reaching his decision."

"W" to może być skrót imienia dziecka w tej sprawie ... (choś niekoniecznie - drugi przykład)

-----------

GUIDELINES IN RELATION TO CHILDREN GIVING EVIDENCE IN FAMILY PROCEEDINGS

1. These Guidelines have been produced by Lord Justice Thorpe's Working Party.
2. This Working Party was set up following a request to the President of the Family Division by the Court of Appeal in Re W [2010] Civ 57, a case which considered the issue of children giving evidence in family proceedings.
3. That same case then went to the Supreme Court and is reported as Re W [2010] UKSC 12. It is now the leading authority on this issue. The Supreme Court held that there was no longer a presumption or even a starting point against children giving evidence in such cases

https://www.judiciary.uk/wp-content/uploads/JCO/Documents/FJ...

-----

However on the 6th of May 2015 the Court of Appeal allowed appeals by the 2nd Respondent ("the father") in this case against care and placement orders made in Brighton County Court on the 19th September 2013 in respect of his daughter W, reported as Re H (Children) [2015] EWCA Civ 583. - https://www.familylawweek.co.uk/site.aspx?i=ed146014

--------

tu przykłady innych spraw dotyczących "minors":

re G (A Minor) (Child Abuse: Standards of Proof) [1987] 1 W.L.R 1461,1466,
and In re W...v. H (Minor) (Child Abuse: Evidence) [1990] Fam. 86, 94, 100,
In re M (A Minor) (Appeal) (No 2) [1994] 1 F.L.R. 59,67,
and In re W (minors) (Sexual Abuse...,
in In re G (A Minor) ( Child Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1987] 1 W.L.R. 1461,1466,
and In re W (Minors) (Sexual Abuse: Standard of Proof) [1994] 1 F.L.R. 419,429,

https://www.casemine.com/search/uk/re w a minor adoption