Dicionário do Marcilio:

prejudicar. 1 – (em processo) to moot; to become moot [Kane, Mary Kay, Civil Procedure, p. 281; Ballentine’s Legal Dictionary and Thesaurus, p. 423; Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law, p. 317]. Nesta acepção, prejudicar e
perder o objeto são sinônimos. “The Court has held that a pre-trial order denying a defense motion to reduce bail may be appealed immediately because the question whether bail has been set too high becomes moot if review is postponed until after trial”. [Cammack, Mark E., Advanced Criminal Procedure, p. 461].

• o tribunal julgou a apelação prejudicada; o tribunal julgou que houve perda do objeto da apelação 􀃆 the appellate court held that the appeal became moot.
• o pedido feito pelo autor não tinha objeto, porque as partes já haviam transacionado 􀃆 the claim asserted by plaintiff was moot, because the parties had already settled their claims.
• questão prejudicada 􀃆 moot question.
• “O deferimento do recurso tornará prejudicado qualquer outro recurso interposto pelas partes”.
􀃆 The grant of the appeal will moot any other appeal filed by the parties.
• o pedido do autor perdeu o objeto, ficou prejudicado 􀃆 plaintiff’s claim became moot; is no longer useful.
• a ação perdeu seu objeto 􀃆 the suit became moot; the suit mooted; the suit is no longer necessary.

https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/BR/139/...

D. Cases Involving "Supervening Mootness" Are Inapplicable

Because DEP blurs the distinction between opinions and judgments, it fails to address the one factor that is fatal to its appeal: approval of the proposed settlement was a justiciable, nonmoot, issue independent of DEP's objection. Instead, DEP relies on a line of cases involving "supervening mootness," i.e., cases where judgment was entered, appeal was taken, and, before the appeal was decided, the case became moot.[7]