Leif Henriksen May 23, 2013:

Just fot the record - so that other viewers do not think I finally have lost it totally: My response at 10:40 was directed at a text which later has been deleted.

Leif Henriksen May 23, 2013:

No 'aggressive' intention I am slightly surprised here, but I can assure you my intentions were, as always, the best ones.

I simply confirmed what you said about a possible abbreviation. I still hold the view that your interpretation of 'one year' is far out, though :)

Ian Giles May 23, 2013:

"ena" - "ett/en år" (could have been a lazy author) - shortened to "ena" internally in document. Given it relates to minimum tenancies, it doesn't seem implausible. However, I didn't suggest it was right - that's why I posted my musing in the discussion thread!

Leif Henriksen May 23, 2013:

Yes, it is an abbreviation, just like I mentioned/expanded in my answer. I fail to see how 'one year' could fit in here.

Ian Giles May 23, 2013:

Looks like a typo or abbreviation (possibly an internal one in the document?).

"One year" perhaps...