Spanish to English Social Sciences Philosophy

This is from a paper on the hypothesis of the predictive brain. I have 3 questions regarding this paragraph, which I will post separately. The English parts are from the author. My draft is below.

Clark se pregunta how mere matter manages to give rise to the whole smorgasbord of mentality, emotion, and intelligent action. Ya no es sólo que el problema de la vida señalado por Friston –mantener la integridad vs la entropía– esté como una condición de posibilidad de ese whole smorgasbord, ni tampoco es sólo que el problema de la percepción, tan **caro** para Hohwy, se presente de forma prácticamente equivalente en cada uno de los componentes de ese whole smorgasbord. Lo que tenemos ahora es que la sola presencia de esa multiplicidad de capacidades ya representa un verdadero problema en sí mismo. Si se quiere, formalmente es el mismo problema que el planteado por Friston –mantener la integridad en la multiplicidad– pero por su contenido no parece que pueda reducirse al de resistir la segunda ley de la termodinámica.

Clark asks how mere matter manages to give rise to the whole smorgasbord of mentality, emotion, and intelligent action. It is not just that the life problem that concerned Friston—maintaining integrity vs entropy—is a condition of possibilty of the whole smorgasbord, nor is it just that the problem of perception, so dear to Hohwy, presents in practically the same way across each of the components of the whole smorgasbord. What we have now is that the mere presence of this multiplicity of capabilities represents a real problem in itself. If you will, it is the same question posed by Friston—maintaining integrity in multiplicity—but due to its content appears not to be reducible to resisting the second law of thermodynanics.

Many thanks.