English term
Where/where
Option 1.- Lowercase
"Viability index (VI) was recorded for the first 3 h and calculated based on the following equation (Milovanov, 1962):
V1 = Σ [ M x ( T – R ) / 2 ]
, where V1 is the viability index..."
Option 2.- Uppercase
"Viability index (VI) was recorded for the first 3 h and calculated based on the following equation (Milovanov, 1962):
V1 = Σ [ M x ( T – R ) / 2 ]
Where V1 is the viability index..."
4 +11 | where (lower case) | Henk Sanderson |
May 7, 2019 12:20: writeaway changed "Field (write-in)" from "Text format after equations" to "Text format after equations/grammar"
Non-PRO (2): Edith Kelly, Rachel Fell
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Responses
where (lower case)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 mins (2019-05-07 09:17:50 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
A relative clause is a kind of subordinate clause that contains the element whose interpretation is provided by an antecedent on which the subordinate clause is grammatically dependent; that is, there is an anaphoric relation between the relativized element in the relative clause and antecedent on which it depends.
That's my approach too, but I've come across several examples of option 2, which is what prompted my query. Thanks for posting. |
agree |
philgoddard
: I 'm not sure I follow your explanation, though. It's lowercase because it's not a new sentence.
29 mins
|
...and it's not a new sentence since it is a relative clause...
|
|
agree |
Charles Davis
36 mins
|
thanks, Charles
|
|
agree |
James A. Walsh
46 mins
|
thanks, James
|
|
agree |
Boryana Yovcheva
1 hr
|
Thanks, Boryana
|
|
agree |
B D Finch
1 hr
|
thanks, B D
|
|
agree |
writeaway
: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Relative_clause URL to your explanation
2 hrs
|
Thanks, writeaway
|
|
agree |
Edith Kelly
2 hrs
|
Thanks, Edith
|
|
agree |
Darius Saczuk
3 hrs
|
Thanks, Dariusz
|
|
agree |
Jennifer Caisley
3 hrs
|
Thanks, Jennifer
|
|
agree |
cmile
2 days 17 hrs
|
agree |
D. I. Verrelli
: The comma (or other punctuation) belongs at the end of the formula (preferably following a single space to distinguish it), never at the beginning of a new line.
50 days
|
Discussion
As for whether it goes on a new line, bear in mind that maths texts use special software to cope with equations and other heavy-duty formatting issues, and in certain cases it may simply not allow them to run the text on in the same line as the equation, though it should. And some people may prefer their equation to stand alone, like an indented quotation. But in principle, "where..." should be run on. The comma should really be included but sometimes isn't, partly, I think, because people don't want anything immediately adjoining their equation.
The output voltage Vout is [Equation appears here],
where V0 is the voltage supplied to the bridge and R1 and R2 are resistances.