This question was closed without grading. Reason: Other
Apr 11, 2023 13:38
1 yr ago
68 viewers *
English term

Commas or em-dashes?

English Tech/Engineering Geology Punctuation
I have met two structurally identical phrases having different punctuation on one page in Exploration and Mining Geology by William C. Peters (1978), chapter 3. Could you please explain to me why the author used em-dashes in the first sentence and two commas in the second one:
1. Harrison Schmitt examined a small molybdenum mine—the New Year's Eve mine—in southern Arizona in 1955.
2. Two newer pits, West Esperanza and Sierrita, are nearby.
Change log

Apr 12, 2023 10:40: writeaway changed "Field (write-in)" from "(none)" to "Punctuation"

Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

Non-PRO (2): Chris Ellison, Yvonne Gallagher

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Discussion

philgoddard Apr 11, 2023:
Nicely put, Tony Because dashes interrupt the flow, they should not have been used here in my opinion.
Tony M Apr 11, 2023:
@ Asker There are several ways of marking a parenthesis in EN, these being 2 of them.
Generally, em-dashes tend to be used where something is genuinely an aside — and ( ) might equally have been used; this tends to interrupt the reader's flow slightly more than the simple use of commas, which are often used to indicate a clause that is of subsidiary interest, but still important.
JaneD Apr 11, 2023:
What Atil Kayhan said.

The bit between the dashes is more of an aside and could be left out of the original sentence. The bit between the two commas *could* be left out, but you'd have to rewrite the sentence, because "Two newer pits are nearby" sounds incomplete. (You could make it "Two newer pits can be found nearby", or "Two newer pits are located nearby" for instance.) It's about the rhythm of the language, essentially.
ATIL KAYHAN Apr 11, 2023:
My Opinion Good point. The second sentence is complete the way it is, and flows very smoothly with the commas. If you take away "West Esperanza and Sierrita" the sentence would be missing something. The first sentence is complete even if you take away "the New Year's Eve mine" and does not really need that part to be meaningful. It is as if the name of the mine is put there as extra information rather than part of the sentence.
Christopher Schröder Apr 11, 2023:
Because they were being inconsistent, nothing else.
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search