philgoddard Mar 23, 2023:

I think you've missed the joke, Daryo. I don't think it was lame.

Daryo Mar 23, 2023:

N'importe quoi!! "ses enfants mineurs qui dépassent le montant légal" = avoir trop d'enfants ?

Really? "le montant légal" must be the legal limit to what is tax exempt, or is under some other favourable tax regime.

IOW it's

intérêts [de ses enfants mineurs] qui dépassent le montant légal
NOT
[intérêts de ses] enfants mineurs qui dépassent le montant légal

+ another clue staring in the face of anyone willing to open their eyes:

le montant légal des intérêts [implied "soumis à une taxation favorable"] is grammatically correct and makes real-life sense
while
le montant légal enfants mineurs is grammatically NOT correct (should be "le nombre de...") and makes NO real-life sense - the only country where it would have made any sense abandoned the "one child policy" in 2015!

If it was an attempt at humour, it's pretty lame - that's the kind of "performance" you would expect from some outdated MT.

Conor McAuley Mar 23, 2023:

"ses enfants mineurs qui dépassent le montant légal" = avoir trop d'enfants ?