Glossary entry

Hungarian term or phrase:

feltűnő értékaránytalanság miatti megtámadási jog

English translation:

the right to contest for obvious disproportionality

Added to glossary by Zoltán Törőcsik
Apr 8, 2022 12:35
2 yrs ago
15 viewers *
Hungarian term

feltűnő értékaránytalanság miatti megtámadási jog

Non-PRO Hungarian to English Law/Patents Law: Contract(s) általános szerződési feltételek
Vevő lemond a Ptk. 6:98 § (2) bekezdésében foglaltak szerinti feltűnő értékaránytalanság miatti megtámadási jogáról.
Votes to reclassify question as PRO/non-PRO:

PRO (1): Ildiko Santana

When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.

How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:

An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)

A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).

Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.

When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.

* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.

Proposed translations

1 day 8 hrs
Selected

the right to contest for obvious disproportionality

megtámadási jog: right to contest
feltűnő értékaránytalanság: obvious disproportionality

Az adott bekezdések angolul:

Section 6:98 [Obvious disproportionality]

(1) If, upon the conclusion of the contract, there is an obvious disproportionality between the value of the service and the consideration, and there is no intention by one of the parties to grant benefits free of charge, the aggrieved party may contest the contract. A person who was able to recognise the *obvious disproportionality* or undertook the risk of obvious disproportionality, shall not contest the contract.

(2) Except for contracts between consumers and undertakings, the parties may exclude in the contract the *right to contest* as determined in paragraph (1).

Magyarul:

6:98. § [Feltűnő értékaránytalanság]

(1) Ha a szolgáltatás és az ellenszolgáltatás értéke között anélkül, hogy az egyik felet az ingyenes juttatás szándéka vezetné, a szerződés megkötésének időpontjában feltűnően nagy az aránytalanság, a sérelmet szenvedett fél a szerződést megtámadhatja. Nem támadhatja meg a szerződést az, aki a feltűnő értékaránytalanságot felismerhette vagy annak kockázatát vállalta.

(2) A felek az (1) bekezdésben megállapított megtámadási jogot – fogyasztó és vállalkozás közötti szerződés kivételével – a szerződésben kizárhatják.
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Köszönöm!"
16 mins

the right to challenge conspicuous disproportion to any value

A belinkelt könyv 177. oldalán találtam a "conspicuous disproportion to any value".
Conspicuous saving vagy conspicuous consumption kifejezésekre számos találat van a neten, tehát a feltűnőre az szerintem mindenképp jó lesz.
Something went wrong...
1 hr

right of contestation on the basis of significantly disproportionate consideration

Pursuant to Section 4:98, Paragraph 2 of the Civil Code, the buyer relinquishes his right of contestation on the basis of significantly disproportionate consideration.


Also consulted: KJK Kerszöv, magyar-angol-magyar jogi szakszótár
https://medium.com/@tkz/feltűnő-értékaránytalanság-a-magyar-...
Something went wrong...
1 hr

the right to avoid an (BrE) extortionate credit bargain

.. based on an unconscionable level of consideration, as I used to tell the girls on Vacsi utca in Budapest.
Example sentence:

UK: The 2006 Act repealed the extortionate credit bargains provisions in their entirety, and introduced new provisions to provide consumers with a broad right to challenge “unfair” credit relationships (the new s.140A to s.140D).

IATE: civil law [LAW] Consilium en avoidance Consilium hu megsemmisítés

Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search