Jul 22, 2020 18:43
3 yrs ago
27 viewers *
German term
referierter Drittmittel
German to English
Science
Education / Pedagogy
Research funding
This is part of a job vacancy advert for research posts in an academic institute. The sentence reads:
Erwartet werden eigene und kooperative Publikationen sowie die Mitwirkung an der Erwerbung auch referierter Drittmittel.
I don't know how "referierter" can fit in this context. Can anyone help, please?
Erwartet werden eigene und kooperative Publikationen sowie die Mitwirkung an der Erwerbung auch referierter Drittmittel.
I don't know how "referierter" can fit in this context. Can anyone help, please?
Proposed translations
(English)
3 +4 | peer-reviewed grants / funding | Jennifer Caisley |
4 | reported external funding | Brent Sørensen |
4 | refereed external funds | Cillie Swart |
References
begutachtete Drittmittel | Erik Freitag |
Proposed translations
+4
1 hr
Selected
peer-reviewed grants / funding
See discussion box for details.
Example sentence:
The c.v. shall include information concerning the nominee's academic training [...] peer reviewed grants;
of which 58 percent obtained 40 peer-reviewed grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and non-NIH funding agencies
Reference:
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Steffen Walter
1 hr
|
Thanks, Steffen!
|
|
agree |
Lancashireman
1 hr
|
Thanks, Andrew!
|
|
agree |
TonyTK
10 hrs
|
Thanks, Tony!
|
|
agree |
Chris Pr
21 hrs
|
Thanks, Chris!
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you very much for your help."
59 mins
reported external funding
Some scientific articles are more likely than others to report external funding
22 hrs
refereed external funds
I agree, peer-reviewed (referierter) doesn't make sense as an adjective here, although I do understand that it could be the wrong German word being used here. But still, I would refereed, in the sense of "verified".
Another option is referenced. I would use that if the job ad mentions some possible third party sources of funding.
You can use verified external funds as in from reputable sources also. But I would prefer refereed as it contains the slight possibly intentional connotation of peer-reviewed to some extent at least. Especially since the context is clearly academic also.
found this English text that helps: in the economic sphere, research, the publication of peer-reviewed articles, and the acquisition of third-party funding.
Another option is referenced. I would use that if the job ad mentions some possible third party sources of funding.
You can use verified external funds as in from reputable sources also. But I would prefer refereed as it contains the slight possibly intentional connotation of peer-reviewed to some extent at least. Especially since the context is clearly academic also.
found this English text that helps: in the economic sphere, research, the publication of peer-reviewed articles, and the acquisition of third-party funding.
Reference comments
54 mins
Reference:
begutachtete Drittmittel
I believe "begutachtete Drittmittel" is a fare more common term for this. Maybe this will help.
Note from asker:
Thank you. That fits in with Jennifer's input, too. |
Discussion
With "Erwerbung" I'm not 100% whether it's talking about simply having *made the applications*, as you suggest (which does sound more natural in English) or actually *gained the funding* (which fits closer with "erwerben" in German) - hopefully the further context will give you a clue there!
You definitely don't need to be logged in to view the links, but I wonder if they were too long and got cut off! Maybe these shortened ones will work - https://bit.ly/2BlbzOX and https://bit.ly/39jtKBf respectively. If they don't work, just searching for the quoted sentences in double quotes should point you towards them, I hope!
Sadly none of your links work. I presume I need to register or something to access them, but I think I have enough to go on. Thank you for your efforts.
That said, I've done a quick bit of research and "peer-reviewed grants" does seem to be relatively common, especially in the sciences (and fits nicely with "referiert" as "peer-reviewed" in the sense of publications, too). E.g. "63 percent of mentees submitted a total of 72 grants, of which 58 percent obtained 40 peer-reviewed grants from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and non-NIH funding agencies." (https://www.acc.org/membership/sections-and-councils/academi... "The c.v. shall include information concerning the nominee's academic training and career, including [...] peer reviewed grants" (https://www.afpc.info/node/57), and this entire academic CV (https://lsa.umich.edu/content/dam/michigan-lsa/people-update... for example.
I believe what they're after with "referiert" in this context is funding applications that are subject to some kind of review process - i.e. where the funding isn't just automatically given out (as it is in some cases), but rather the application for the funding is reviewed against a broader field so the funding is given to the projects with the most merit etc.
It looks a bit bizarre to the rest of the world but a core part of academic job applications lies in demonstrating previous success in attaining funding (which could presumably be carried forward in the future, too), and that's how I read this here.
If it's helpful, there's a brief explanation in this link [https://wbw.unileoben.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/shares/wbw...] - "die Einnahmen aus Projekten der Forschung im Sinne von Antragsmittel (referierte Drittmittel)", i.e. funding that you have to submit an actual "Antrag" for.
It's really nothing to do with it being reported or referred, I'm afraid, but the term we'd use escapes me at present! I'll pop back when it comes back to me! :)