German term
hinbekommen
Would you agree that I can avoid translating hinbekommen by saying;
"Do you not think the refugees can be integrated (into society)?"
3 +8 | manage, succeed etc. | Jennifer Caisley |
4 +1 | manage to integrate | David Hollywood |
4 | pull off | Michael Martin, MA |
4 | successfully carry out | Bernhard Sulzer |
Apr 26, 2019 10:30: Steffen Walter changed "Level" from "Non-PRO" to "PRO"
PRO (3): Bernhard Sulzer, Björn Vrooman, Steffen Walter
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
manage, succeed etc.
https://www.openthesaurus.de/synonyme/hinbekommen
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 mins (2019-04-25 19:58:43 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Possibly closer to the German, and still idiomatic, would be "Don't you think that we'll manage to integrate refugees?" This maintains the notion of "wir", while also highlighting that this is referring to a specific instance, rather than whether refugees "can" be integrated more broadly.
you're absolutely right Jennifer, keeping the 'we' does make much more sense, many thanks! |
agree |
Kirsten Bodart
: more 'succeed' IMO. But both are great.
3 mins
|
Thank you, and thanks for your comment above regarding "Wir schaffen das" - that's exactly what came to mind for me, too!
|
|
agree |
David Hollywood
: didn't see yours before posting mine and fine
3 hrs
|
Thank you! (no problem - it's such a race sometimes!)
|
|
agree |
AllegroTrans
5 hrs
|
Thank you!
|
|
agree |
Ramey Rieger (X)
12 hrs
|
agree |
writeaway
16 hrs
|
agree |
Melanie Meyer
17 hrs
|
agree |
Steffen Walter
: with the sentence you suggested in your added note
17 hrs
|
agree |
Michele Fauble
19 hrs
|
pull off
My suggestion:
"Don't you think we can pull off the integration of the refugees?
disagree |
AllegroTrans
: too casual
2 hrs
|
I couldn't disagree more. Ausser mir hat bisher keiner die Uebersetzung vernuenftig hinbekommen
|
|
agree |
Björn Vrooman
: Don't agree with your sentence, but disagreement is unjustified. Cf. Duden. If it were a higher register, the person would've used "bewältigen."/Agree with writeaway, too, but that's not about register, IMO. Give them time to look at the 1,700 COCA refs.
9 hrs
|
You know things are hopeless when even Duden cannot convince people that a term is umgangssprachlich
|
|
neutral |
writeaway
: wrong register. don't agree with the agree /how can integration be "pulled off". They pulled off getting into Germany, that yes......
14 hrs
|
There seem to be some weird misconceptions about how the German term is used
|
|
neutral |
Michele Fauble
: Yes, need to get the register right. ‘Pull off’ doesn’t do that.
17 hrs
|
Yeah right. I am bowing out at this point. No time to reinvent the wheel
|
manage to integrate
Do you not think we can manage to integrate the refugees?
agree |
AllegroTrans
1 hr
|
thanks AT but Jennifer is first ... anyway this is the meaning
|
successfully carry out
You seem doubtful that we'll be able to/we can successfully carry out the integration of (the) refugees.
or: ... that we can successfully carry out the task of integrating the refugees.
This deals with the issue of integration, a complex task that can only be accomplished/successfully carried out when important conditions are met.
"hinbekommen" IMO can go in the direction of getting a task done when putting lots of efforts in it.
Although "hinbekommen" can conjure up "can we pull it off/get it done/carry it off it etc in a more casual tone. Sounds something one politician would say to another. More context would be helpful to be sure if this is indeed supposed to be in a more serious tone.
But given the subject, I believe in a more serious register.
See:
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/05/10-ways-countries-can...
Also see:
https://www.migrationpolicy.org/article/newcomers-north-labo...
"High-income states known for their generous welfare systems and hospitality toward protection seekers—have turned to the sizable task of integrating the new arrivals into the labor market."
Discussion
In any case, I don't know whether this is a UK/US difference, but most suggestions sound a bit stiff (or even stuffy) to me.
I think this has something to do with the start of your sentence.
I'd haven chosen one of the following:
Are you saying that we...
So what you're saying is that...
In other words, we...
It's a hunch, mind you, but the interviewer might be doing this for one of the reasons listed here: https://www.mediafirst.co.uk/our-thinking/that-so-what-you-a...
Also, integrated into society is too general--I guess this is where I agree with both Jennifer and Kirsten.
It's not a question of whether integration can ever be successful but rather whether Germany has enough administrative capacity to deal with the situation in the long run.
Best