Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Dutch term or phrase:
hernemen (Belgian dutch)
English translation:
appear
- The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2016-08-05 08:54:08 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Dutch term
hernemen (Belgian dutch)
"De modaliteiten zijn hernomen in Bijlage R."
"De technische documenten die van toepassing zijn op onderhavige overeenkomst zijn hernomen in Bijlage C."

"Opmerking: specifieke technische afkortingen zijn hernomen in Bijlage C."
This is from a large Belgian government tender.
zijn hernomen in Bijlage X =
are repeated in Appendix X
or just sth like
are listed in Appendix X
are given in Appendix X
are specified in Appendix X
?
4 +2 | appear | katerina turevich |
Aug 1, 2016 18:44: sindy cremer changed "Level" from "PRO" to "Non-PRO"
Aug 1, 2016 18:47: sindy cremer changed "Field" from "Law/Patents" to "Other"
Non-PRO (3): Barend van Zadelhoff, writeaway, sindy cremer
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
appear
in your context
http://www.vlaamswoordenboek.be/definities/zoek
I think in these documents the fact that it is 'repeated/mentioned again' doesn't really matter
agree |
Barend van Zadelhoff
: I would just say 'included', thay are just dumped there as they are. Agree no need to make a mountain out of a molehill here. // Every situation is unique, you cannot use this as a general rule.
3 mins
|
Thanks Barend! English encourages using the active voice. .
|
|
agree |
Tina Vonhof (X)
: and with Barend.
1 hr
|
Reference comments
Thanks! |
Discussion
So it's clear that "hernomen in" just means "vermeld in".
however, in your context active voice would sound better, or it doesn't matter as I mentioned above.
but I don't want to get into a lengthy discussion
not to mention that nobody expects EU documents to be examples of stylistic perfection.
It does make the sentence shorter.
If I do provide information on what I have so far, Barend complains (and in this case, writeaway too).
;-)
Also agree with writeaway that there is absolutely nothing wrong with the passive voice. That's just something certain English teachers, and maybe MS Word's grammar checker, used to insist on.