Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Spanish term or phrase:
exclusividad judicial
English translation:
judicial exclusivity
Spanish term
exclusividad judicial
Consecuencia de la exclusividad judicial, es la exigencia de control judicial en el desarrollo, prórroga y cese de la medida, lo que se traduce en la remisión de las grabaciones originales al Juzgado.
Thanks in advance.
| 4 +2 | judicial exclusivity |
jude dabo
|
| 3 +1 | judicial exclusivity |
Robert Carter
|
| 3 | (AmE) judicial prerogative |
Adrian MM. (X)
|
Jan 21, 2016 12:23: jude dabo Created KOG entry
Non-PRO (2): philgoddard, Yvonne Gallagher
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
judicial exclusivity
Mexico
Translating full-time since 1998
Native in: English (Variant: British) 
Works in: Spanish to English
judicial exclusivity
At the outset of our second generation under the Charter, the Court's role is clear: it has claimed the role of guardian of the constitution. For their parts, however, neither Parliament nor the provincial legislatures have asserted any claim to interpretive authority where the Charter is concerned. On the contrary, judicial exclusivity in Charter interpretation is a norm that has been factored into political deliberations.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1153072
The Court attempted to justify its radical understanding of the Court’s role by abusing precedent—in this case, perhaps the most famous case in the history of the Supreme Court—Marbury v. Madison. But Marbury said not a word about judicial supremacy or exclusivity. In fact, Marbury specifically articulated a limited judiciary: “The province of the court is, solely, to decide on the rights of individuals, not to enquire how the executive, or executive officers, perform duties in which they have a discretion. Questions, in their nature political, or which are, by the constitution and laws, submitted to the executive, can never be made in this court.” The Cooper Court engaged in precedential revisionism in order to arrogate power unto itself.
http://www.heritage.org/initiatives/rule-of-law/judicial-act...
I have the gravest concerns about the chief justice's statements regarding the validity of the Senate's opinions and actions to prohibit non-judicial, off-the-Bench international activities by Canadian judges, and the Senate's corollary assertion of the public interest in judges' impartiality, integrity, and judicial exclusivity.
http://senatorcools.sencanada.ca/Speech-in-Senate-Chamber-Se...
Exclusividad judicial en su vertiente negativa: se encuentra prevista en el artículo 146, primer y segundo párrafos, de la Constitución, según la cual los jueces no pueden desempeñar otra función que no sea la jurisdiccional, salvo la docencia universitaria.
Exclusividad judicial en su vertiente positiva: se contempla en el artículo 139, inciso 1, de la Constitución, según el cual sólo el Poder Judicial puede ejercer función jurisdiccional
http://www.tc.gob.pe/jurisprudencia/2006/00004-2006-AI.html
| agree |
Yvonne Gallagher
: same as Jude's but with refs
18 hrs
|
|
Thanks, Gallagy, that's why I didn't remove it.
|
(AmE) judicial prerogative
he Judicial Prerogative. Thomas W. Merrill. Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.pace.edu/plr.
Something went wrong...