Glossary entry (derived from question below)
English term or phrase:
let alone
English answer:
it's ok in your context
- The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2015-03-31 23:55:28 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Mar 28, 2015 12:02
9 yrs ago
7 viewers *
English term
let alone
Non-PRO
English
Science
General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters
General
There is no other literature in the English language that offers a comparably comprehensive and in-depth study of the translation of western science, let alone medicine, in China in a similar time period.
=================
Can I use "let alone" in academic writing?
And, is there any problem with the above setence? Thanks!
=================
Can I use "let alone" in academic writing?
And, is there any problem with the above setence? Thanks!
Responses
3 +9 | it's ok in your context | writeaway |
4 -1 | In particular | Lincoln Hui |
3 | still less | Tony M |
Change log
Mar 28, 2015 13:31: writeaway changed "Field (specific)" from "Science (general)" to "General / Conversation / Greetings / Letters"
Responses
+9
47 mins
Selected
it's ok in your context
I don't see what's wrong with using it. xx, xx, xx, not to mention (let alone) medicine.
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
-1
13 mins
In particular
You can use "let alone" in academic writing, but not in this case.
When "...x, let alone y", y is in addition to x or raised in degree compared to x, but decidedly not a part of x.
As medicine is a subset of western science (or presumably intended to be so in this context), "let alone" is inappropriate.
When "...x, let alone y", y is in addition to x or raised in degree compared to x, but decidedly not a part of x.
As medicine is a subset of western science (or presumably intended to be so in this context), "let alone" is inappropriate.
Peer comment(s):
disagree |
Tony M
: That actually changes the meaning quite a lot! It implies that medicine might be for some reason specifically excluded, which is not at all the meaning of the source text.
39 mins
|
Upon second thought I don't suppose I was thinking too clearly when writing my answer. But I was actually guessing that the asker might be looking for something different from what they actually wrote.
|
52 mins
still less
Although it changes the slant of the meaning slightly, this could be more suitable in a formal academic context.
Something went wrong...