Glossary entry

French term or phrase:

valeur d'emergence

English translation:

(noise) emergence value

Added to glossary by Tony M
Jul 27, 2014 08:00
9 yrs ago
3 viewers *
French term

valeur d'emergence

French to English Tech/Engineering Environment & Ecology noise emissions
Mise en place d’un dispositif d’insonorisation de la turbine en conformité avec les valeurs d’émergence autorisées par l’arrêté préfectoral du site soit 5dB de jour et 3dB de nuit en limite de site
Change log

Aug 10, 2014 06:30: Tony M Created KOG entry

Discussion

Tony M Jul 28, 2014:
@ Anca This is nothing to do with "translating mot-à-mot" — it is simply a question of using a meaningful term in EN to translate a meaningful term (the SAME one!) in FR.

Whether or not a footnote is necessary or desirable is clearly a question for Asker to decide, no doubt based in part on the expected level of technical knowledge of the intended readership of this document.
Anca Florescu-Mitchell Jul 28, 2014:
@ Tony If you believe in translating mot-à-mot, the proper definition of this (apparently) French notion has to be added in a footnoot

émergence : la différence entre les niveaux de pression continus équivalents pondérés A du bruit ambiant (établissement en fonctionnement) et du bruit résiduel (en l'absence du bruit généré par l'établissement) ; dans le cas d'un établissement faisant l'objet d'une modification autorisée, le bruit résiduel exclut le bruit généré par l'ensemble de l'établissement modifié ;

(from http://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/affichTexte.do?cidTexte=LEGITE...
Tony M Jul 28, 2014:
@ Anca The issue of value or level is irrelevant; I believe in sticking close to the FR original and using 'value' unless there is a reason to depart from it, but others believe that 'level' is better — I do not think this is a key issue in this particular question.

The reference I cite is an EN decription of a purely FR concept — as you will read if you look at the previous KudoZ reference I also cited. It is an official FR Govenment document, which appears to have been well translated, and there is no reason to question its authority.

However, my key argument with you is simply that, while the term you suggest is of course a perfectly valid term in EN, it is NOT in any way, shape, or form a translation of the source term — they are two entirely different concepts.
Anca Florescu-Mitchell Jul 27, 2014:
@ Tony You read levels even if I say value. I now what a valeur d'émergence is in Franch, but I am not sure how you would call them in English. What you quote is just a French translation.
Tony M Jul 27, 2014:
@ Anca I'm sorry, but they DO! I am an experienced acoustics engineer, so I know what I'm talking about, and if these were merely emission levels, they would be insignificant — whereas in fact, as emergence values, they represent a pretty stringent specification.

It's easy to find references to support this or that suggestion; but none of your references so far have any direct link to any translation of the very specific topic here, which is detailed in the source-reference I have mentioned below. What you are doing here is seeking to compare apples and oranges.
Anca Florescu-Mitchell Jul 27, 2014:
@ Tony The figures quoted do not say that much; the mean A-weighted sound power level, LWA,m has values of the same order of magnitude.

http://ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecm...

http://www.ecma-international.org/publications/standards/Ecm...
Tony M Jul 27, 2014:
Special meaning here! 'emergence' means the extent to which the noise emission STANDS OUT from the background noise level; this is made clear by the figures quoted, which would be completely wrong if these were actual emission levels!

Proposed translations

+2
10 hrs
Selected

(noise) emergence value

http://www.installationsclassees.developpement-durable.gouv....

What is emergence?

“Emergence is a temporary modification of the ambient level caused by the appearance or disappearance of a specific noise.” AFNOR

Emergence is defined under the law as the difference between the equivalent A-weighted continuous acoustic pressure levels of ambient noise (operating facility) and residual noise (in the absence of noise generated by the facility but measured over the operating period of the facility); in the case of a facility subject to an authorised modification, residual noise does not include the noise generated by the entire modified facility.

And please see previous KudoZ:

http://www.proz.com/kudoz/french_to_english/environment_ecol...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 heures (2014-07-27 19:01:18 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

The figures given indicate that adding the unwanted (polluting) noise must not add more than 5 db (day) / 3 dB (night) to the background noise level — the 3 dB night value in particular is extremely low, so an extremely stringent requirement.

However, that view is slightly simplistic, in terms of the way in which it can be assessed...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 heures (2014-07-27 19:04:56 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

It attempts to quantify, of course, how disturbing a noise is when it goes on and off, for example. The figure of 3 dB for night would be fairly unobtrusive against a typical quiet country background level of say 30 dB (but would represent a much lower SPL, like a bird singing softly), whereas against a 140 dB jet engine, it would be a much higher actual SPL!
Peer comment(s):

agree B D Finch : You're right and I should have remembered it from a fairly recent translation I did. Though I think it's "level" rather than "value".
1 hr
Thanks, B! I think that point is arguable, but I certainly won't dispute your suggestion.
agree Duncan Moncrieff : The nature of the concept definitely requires the use of emergence.
1 day 12 hrs
Thanks a lot, Duncan!
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
59 mins

[noise] emission value

Many references on the Internet.
Peer comment(s):

agree Claire Cox : I have it down in my glossaries as "noise aggravation", but I think in this case they're referring to noise emissions
1 hr
Thank you, Claire.
disagree Tony M : It has a very special meaning here, and the figures give the lie to this suggestion. / The issue is not the mere semantics of 'level' vs. 'value', but of the underlying concept, as explained by the official French source in my ref.
9 hrs
Value, Tony, not level.
Something went wrong...
-1
2 hrs

noise levels

www.kineticsnoise.com › Industrial Noise and Vibration
Noise ordinances are laws which limit the allowable noise level(s) at different times of day for different zoned areas (i.e. residential, commercial, industrial).
Peer comment(s):

disagree Tony M : It has a very special meaning here, and the figures give the lie to this suggestion.
8 hrs
Something went wrong...
-1
2 hrs

noise emission level

books.google.co.uk/books?isbn=148318224X
N. A. Chigier - 1979 - ‎Science
The introduction of these devices has led to reduction in fuel economy and to ... but have relatively high smoke, odor-constituents and noise emission levels.

www.fhwa.dot.gov › Environment › Noise › Measurement
This section describes recommended procedures for the measurement of vehicle noise emission levels. Among other purposes, emission levels are required to ...

www.fhwa.dot.gov › Environment › Noise › Measurement
This section describes recommended procedures for the measurement of vehicle noise emission levels. Among other purposes, emission levels are required to ...
Peer comment(s):

disagree Tony M : It has a very special meaning here, and the figures give the lie to this suggestion.
8 hrs
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search