Glossary entry

Spanish term or phrase:

Despreciando - despreciar

English translation:

ignore (as negligible); disregard (as negligible)

Added to glossary by TechLawDC
Aug 8, 2012 04:17
11 yrs ago
3 viewers *
Spanish term

Despreciando - despreciar

Spanish to English Tech/Engineering Other
Para ángulos pequeños es posible despreciar a partir del segundo término y obtener expresiones más simples.
Hace referencia a ecuaciones - expresiones aproximadas
Change log

Aug 22, 2012 09:22: TechLawDC Created KOG entry

Proposed translations

+3
31 mins
Selected

ignore (as negligible)

For small angles the terms after the second one can be ignored, to obtain simpler expressions.
Alternative: For small angles, the terms after the second one can be ignored (as being negligible), to simplify the expressions.
(This is perfectly ordinary language in mathematics.)
Peer comment(s):

agree telefpro
2 hrs
agree MPGS : :)
3 hrs
agree David Hollywood : spot on :)
1 day 6 hrs
Something went wrong...
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer. Comment: "Selected automatically based on peer agreement."
9 mins

reduce / decrease

hope it helps
Something went wrong...
4 mins

depreciate

:)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 mins (2012-08-08 04:33:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

www.ehow.com/video_4950914_calculate-straightline...
29 Apr 2009 - 3 min
Calculating the straight-line depreciation using Microsoft Excel requires using a formula that subtracts the ...
Something went wrong...
4 hrs

Neglecting - neglect

as an alternative to 'ignore'
usual math lingo
:)

( )2 ( )2 ( )n
www.eftaylor.com/pub/GRtoPLA.pdf - Traducir esta página
Formato de archivo: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Vista rápida
the denominator of the second term on the right side of (1). (We will see later why this quantity cannot be neglected in the first term.) Divide equation (1) through ...

Einstein's constant - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/.../Einstein's_consta... - Traducir esta página
The second term corresponds to the small perturbation (due to the presence of a gravitating body) ... If we neglect terms of order \displaystyle \varepsilon\rho_0 ...

Ion acoustic wave - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
en.wikipedia.org/.../Ion_acoustic_wa... - Traducir esta página
is small (the plasma approximation), we can neglect the second term on the term, and the wave is dispersionless \omega = v_sk with v_s independent of k.

PLANAR LIQUID SHEETS AT LOW REYNOLDS NUMBERS
www.biblioteca.uma.es/.../16695069.... - Traducir esta página
Formato de archivo: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Vista rápida
de JI RAMOS - 1996 - Citado por 18 - Artículos relacionados
Aidun? perhaps unaware of the solution obtained by Clarke,3 neglected the second term on the left- hand side of the above equation and obtained an analytical ...
[PDF]
SCALE ANALYSIS OF THE SIGNIFICANCE OF DISPERSION IN ...
www.caves.org/.../cave-72-03-150.pd... - Traducir esta página
Formato de archivo: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Vista rápida
de G LI - Citado por 1 - Artículos relacionados
the third term, the dispersion, can be neglected. Then both terms can be ignored, in which case the main balance is between the second term and the right-hand ...
Something went wrong...
6 hrs

disregard

If we disregard the quantity i/2 in the first term of (66) the dispersion relation
becomes..... ****long mathmathetical formula)

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 6 hrs (2012-08-08 10:31:11 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

From Math Counts Mini...

Follow-up Problems
5. We can ignore the unknown first term and consider the sequence beginning with −7 and with 106 as the fourth term. We know that to go from −7 to 106 the common difference, d, is added three times. So we have the equation −7 + 3d = 106. Solving this equation we see that 3d = 113, and d = 113/3. The fourteenth term of the original sequence is now the thirteenth term when we ***disregard**** the first term and consider the sequence beginning with −7. So the thirteenth term of the sequence is −7 + 12d = −7 + 12 × (113/3) = −7 + 4 × 113 = −7 + 452 = 445.


http://mathcounts.org/document.doc?id=832
Something went wrong...
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search