Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
ne préjugent (en este contexto)
Spanish translation:
implican / pesuponen
French term
ne préjugent (en este contexto)
Gracias
4 +4 | implican / pesuponen | Milagros Gutierrez Castro |
4 +1 | no son indicativas | Rafael Molina Pulgar |
4 | garantizan | Emiliano Pantoja |
3 | no prejuzgan (los resultados...) | maría josé mantero obiols |
Non-PRO (1): montse c.
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
implican / pesuponen
no prejuzgan (los resultados...)
Les traités ne préjugent en rien le régime de la propriété dans les États membres.
Los Tratados no prejuzgan en modo alguno el régimen de la propiedad en los Estados miembros.
http://eur-lex.europa.eu/Notice.do?mode=dbl&lang=fr&ihmlang=...
garantizan
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 minutos (2012-02-16 10:07:06 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
Los rendimientos pasados no garantizan o no son indicativos de rendimientos en el futuro
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hora (2012-02-16 11:08:10 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
http://fondosinversion.com.mx/tag/fondos
www.hsbc.com.ar/ar/pdf/pfs/Investment/RendimientosInvestire...
www.sgcib.com/spain/UserFiles/.../Rainbow Express def.ppt
www.bancomer.com/siabinternet/repdoctos.asp?pdf=00007024
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 1 hora (2012-02-16 11:12:29 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
www.bbvafondos.com/BBVAGESTION/BBVAGestion/.../avisoleg.js
www.banif.es/csbnf/StaticBS?blobcol=urldata
http://www.axa.es/appl/accumulator/ejemplo.htm
www.bestinver.es/rentabilidadeshistoricas.aspx
www.rankia.com/.../1057841-igual-que-rentabilidades-pasadas...
https://www.deutsche-bank.es/pbc/data/es/11001.htm
cai.ahorro.com/acnet/fondos_de.../inversor_moderado.acnet
no son indicativas
cnmv.es/DocPortal/Legislacion/.../IIC/instruccionesrentabhisweb.pdf
Formato de archivo: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Vista rápida
Rentabilidades pasadas no son indicativas de resultados futuros. − Los gastos corrientes así como la comisión de resultados 2 están incluidos en el cálculo de ...
Porcentajes de rentabilidades y comisiones - Pensiones y Cesantías
https://www.ing.com.co/.../porcentajes-de-rentabilidades-y-c...
23 Dic 2011 – Estas rentabilidades NO son indicativas de futuros resultados. (*) El Fondo de Pensiones Obligatorias existente antes de la entrada en ...
Something went wrong...