English to Spanish Science Philosophy Discussion of science vs. imagination

Returning to science, we should understand it not simply in terms of evidential criteria,
verification, and falsification, as many positivists may demand, but also in terms of
imagination. We bring our imagination to science, and what science brings to us, as
philosophers, is a reminder that reality matters. An Africana philosophy of science will bring to
our understanding of science not only the dangers of scientific reductionism but also the value of
scientific and philosophical imagination. Sylvester James Gates, Jr., had put it this way in the
keynote address he delivered at the Caribbean Philosophical Association meetings in Puerto Rico:
Science is a discourse that can be learned as any other discourse. What this means is
that those who develop a sufficient level of facility with that discourse achieve more than
semantic and grammatical knowledge but also the next level—namely, style. That dimension is
epistemologically rich since, as we know with ordinary languages, adverbs affect meaning. To
work at that level is the equivalent of making the scientific statements, in a word, groove, and do
so through epistemological relations of differing dimensional scope.

What do they mean by "groove" here?
Thank you in advance for any ideas.