Glossary entry (derived from question below)
French term or phrase:
Prise de vue
English translation:
image acquisition
French term
Prise de vue
Would it be “shot”?
« Le développement de l'imagerie numérique et l'intégration de fonctions de prise de vue statique (photo) ou dynamique (vidéo) dans un nombre croissant d'appareils, notamment dans les téléphones mobiles, ont pour effet de faire naître de nouveaux besoins en matière d'analyse et / ou de traitement d'images. »
Thank you in advance
3 +2 | image acquisition | chris collister |
5 +1 | shot | SMcG (X) |
4 | shooting | Tony M |
Non-PRO (1): SMcG (X)
When entering new questions, KudoZ askers are given an opportunity* to classify the difficulty of their questions as 'easy' or 'pro'. If you feel a question marked 'easy' should actually be marked 'pro', and if you have earned more than 20 KudoZ points, you can click the "Vote PRO" button to recommend that change.
How to tell the difference between "easy" and "pro" questions:
An easy question is one that any bilingual person would be able to answer correctly. (Or in the case of monolingual questions, an easy question is one that any native speaker of the language would be able to answer correctly.)
A pro question is anything else... in other words, any question that requires knowledge or skills that are specialized (even slightly).
Another way to think of the difficulty levels is this: an easy question is one that deals with everyday conversation. A pro question is anything else.
When deciding between easy and pro, err on the side of pro. Most questions will be pro.
* Note: non-member askers are not given the option of entering 'pro' questions; the only way for their questions to be classified as 'pro' is for a ProZ.com member or members to re-classify it.
Proposed translations
image acquisition
shot
static shot (photo) or dynamic (video)
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 22 mins (2010-12-08 09:48:12 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
ps. 'prise de vue' is context specific, as chris collister pointed out.
Something went wrong...