Glossary entry (derived from question below)
Russian term or phrase:
муть редкая
English translation:
unbelievable junk
- The asker opted for community grading. The question was closed on 2010-01-01 16:54:09 based on peer agreement (or, if there were too few peer comments, asker preference.)
Dec 28, 2009 22:37
14 yrs ago
Russian term
муть редкая
Russian to English
Other
Computers (general)
Context: printers, cartridges, etc. If I've understood the source text correctly, this is a comment made regarding Epson ink jets after a generally positive remark. It appears in parentheses:
(к струйнникам Epson не относится, муть редкая)
(к струйнникам Epson не относится, муть редкая)
Proposed translations
(English)
5 +4 | unbelievable junk | Anton Konashenok |
4 +1 | rubbish | Angleterre (X) |
4 | out of the blue | Alexandra Taggart |
4 | Sheer idiocy | draglinepm |
Proposed translations
+4
18 mins
Selected
unbelievable junk
or any other similar expression
the colloquial meaning of "муть" is junk, crap, etc.
"редкая" here adds a sarcastic note - the kind of junk rarely if ever encountered...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2009-12-28 22:57:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
So, your phrase means "the above does not apply to inkjets by Epson, they are crap" - apparently, prior text was either about other brands of inkjets, or about other types of printers by Epson.
the colloquial meaning of "муть" is junk, crap, etc.
"редкая" here adds a sarcastic note - the kind of junk rarely if ever encountered...
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 20 mins (2009-12-28 22:57:58 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
So, your phrase means "the above does not apply to inkjets by Epson, they are crap" - apparently, prior text was either about other brands of inkjets, or about other types of printers by Epson.
Peer comment(s):
agree |
Alina EN-RU
: Not other Epson inkjets but OTHER brands (from other manufacturers)
47 mins
|
Спасибо, Галина // Without the context, it's ambiguous: the positive remark might apply either to other brands of inkjets, or to NON-inkjets by Epson. Since this is a review, I'm leaning more towards the latter.
|
|
agree |
Iryna Dubrouskaya
: thank you, I absolutely agree with your explanation of the term and what it applies to
1 hr
|
Спасибо, Ирина
|
|
agree |
Mikhail Kropotov
4 hrs
|
Спасибо, Михаил
|
|
agree |
Igor Blinov
6 hrs
|
Спасибо, Игорь
|
4 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Thank you, Anton. I used your translation, though the other variants are also good. Thank you to all."
6 mins
out of the blue
Or "муть голубая".
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 mins (2009-12-28 22:46:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
"Муть" - mirky waters/brain , coll.-ambiguity.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2009-12-28 22:48:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
That what was written about Epson printers - is not true.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 mins (2009-12-28 22:46:15 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
"Муть" - mirky waters/brain , coll.-ambiguity.
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 11 mins (2009-12-28 22:48:41 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
That what was written about Epson printers - is not true.
+1
19 mins
rubbish
smth that's just... bad quality. or not worth the money in this case
7 hrs
Sheer idiocy
The comment is most probably related to the usage part of the Epson cartridges' driver, which has a remarkable feature of beginning to nag at the user long time before the cartridge had actually lost its capacity. Otherwise I have nothing bad to say about Epson printers – only positive experience since 1995.
Since the expression used is purely colloquial, Sheer idiocy would be the best equivalent to it in the given context, in my opinion
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs (2009-12-29 06:17:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I would like to stress again that such a kind of comment would not be fair applied to Epson jet printers in general - they are among the best, in my opinion - except this cartridge usage feature.
Since the expression used is purely colloquial, Sheer idiocy would be the best equivalent to it in the given context, in my opinion
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 7 hrs (2009-12-29 06:17:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
I would like to stress again that such a kind of comment would not be fair applied to Epson jet printers in general - they are among the best, in my opinion - except this cartridge usage feature.
Discussion