IP-Chemist May 13, 2009:

@Yasumoto and Jutta No, see my changes.

Jutta Wappel May 13, 2009:

To IP Chemist Yes, do please explain yourself!

Yasutomo Kanazawa May 13, 2009:

To IP-Chemist I don't understand. Are you implying that the term entered in the glossary is incorrect?

IP-Chemist May 13, 2009:

Na bravo! It's always the same poor story. Some people post an answer, independently of its correctness, some askers think to have picked the ONE AND ONLY correct answer THAT FITS BEST and close the question before 24 h have passed by (as far as I know there is or was a kudoz rule for this), and some people make a glossary entry of this and spread actually ambiguous information.

Yasutomo Kanazawa May 13, 2009:

Thank you too, Sueg for pointing out my misinterpretation. I'm a bit wiser now.

Yasutomo Kanazawa May 13, 2009:

Thank you franglish and Jutta Thank you to both for backing me up. Ausschliesslich was the "ambiguity" for me, since the word has two meanings as you may know; "except" (excluding) and "only", and I misinterpreted as the former.

Susan Geiblinger (asker) May 13, 2009:

No, I do not think so. I thank all colleagues including Yasutomo who take the time to answer my and other people's questions but the second part of the answer was very misleading.

Jutta Wappel May 13, 2009:

with franglish I totally agree with franglish - Yasutomo provided the answer you were looking for. Kudoz isn't about being 100% perfect, it's about colleagues helping each other and any help should be appreciated, in my opinion.

franglish May 13, 2009:

@Sueg Why no points? Yasumoto's answer as to the asked term is perfectly valid, even if he misinterprets what follows. At least 2 points would be fair, don't you think?