ihsası rey: ‘İhsası rey’ şudur. (hakimlerin) Bakılmakta olan veya bakması olası bir davada oyunu ihsas ettirme yani sezindirme, yani ima yoluyla açıklama demek.”, bu en geçerli tarif Sabih Kanadoğlu’na aittir.
ihsas etmek: insinuate
http://www.tureng.com/search/ihsas etmek
"[i]t is not claimed-nor can it be-that this judge ever uttered or even INSINUATED ANY OPINION about [petitioner], the merits of his case, or his guilt or innocence."
www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2003/0responses/2003-0575.resp.htm... - 27k

"He is expected to go back into court under a "Rule 35" and the judge insinuated that he would reduce his 70 month sentence then"
www.prisontalk.com/forums/archive/index.php/t-57019.html - 17k

ayrıca bakabilirsiniz :
http://www.google.com.tr/search?q="insinuate an opinion" jud...


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 9 hrs (2008-10-27 09:56:38 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

ihsası rey: implicitly expressing opinion on a lawsuit (By Sabih Kanadoğlu, Chief Presecutor)

Üstü kapalı ifade anlamında kullanılmış.

when there is a doubt concerning the objective decision of the judge you can reject that judge to decide for that court case. this is called ''ihsasi rey''

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 15 saat (2008-10-27 15:59:20 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

hakimlerin karardan once fikir/kanaat belirtmesi ''ihsasi rey''dir ve bu mahkemenin objektifligi konusunda soru isareti ve bu reddi hakim nedenidir ama reddi hakim ve ihsasi rey ayni degil. ama ben rejcetion of the judge diye sacmalarsam elbette sonuc bu olur.
ozur dilerim. ingilizcesi bu durmda insuniation of the opinion oluyor.

Judicial disqualification

.....

28 U.S.C. sec. 144, captioned ** "Bias or prejudice of judge," ** provides that under circumstances, when a party to a case in a United States District Court files a "timely and sufficient affidavit that the judge before whom the matter is pending has a personal bias or prejudice either against him or in favor of an adverse party," the case shall be transferred to another judge.

The general rule is that to warrant recusal, a judge's ** expression of an opinion ** about the merits of a case or familiarity with the facts or the parties must have originated in a source outside the case itself. This is referred to in the United States as the "extra-judicial source rule" and was recognized as a general presumption, although not an invariable one, in the 1994 U.S. Supreme Court decision in Liteky v. United States.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 18 hrs (2008-10-27 19:03:24 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

expression of opinion (outside the case)

self-explatory