...amely általában összecsukható, de nem mindig.
A "campaign" utal a katonai eredetre, lehet campaign furniture-ről beszélni, amibe rengeteg féle bútordarab tartozik.

A stool lehet merev v. összecsukható, néha kartámlája van, de háta nincs, ezért stool.
A legegyszerűbb fajtája a magyar vadásszékkel azonos.

www.britishcampaignfurniture.com/products?id=29032

www.armamentaria.com/store/index.php?main_page=product_info...

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 24 mins (2008-03-06 13:41:33 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

A stílusa korral változott, és nem az "outdoor" a lényeg, sőt, általában legalább sátor védte azokat, akik vihettek magukkal bútort a "campaign"-ra. A praktikussága, összepakolhatósága volt a lényeg.

Az a vicces, hogy alighanem jól pontoztál az előbb. Bizony "kemping-székről" van szó, csak antik kivitelben. Ezért inkább a tábori széket használnám.
Itt van egy rövid leírás az eredetéről:

Lewis Drake and Associates evokes a contemporary look with a vintage allure by producing fine handmade British campaign furniture antique reproductions in beautifully figured rosewood and durable buffalo hide leather.

*** This “knock down” or “break down” portable safari furniture was originally designed for the British army in the late 1700’s for use outdoors so it is perfectly suited for your boat, patio, poolside, campsite, or favorite sporting event as well as your library, den, or office. *** (British Campaign Furniture)
Lehet, hogy mi mást értünk a "kemping" alatt, de ez a viktoriánus korban másképp volt:

In 1837, when George Eden (1784-1849), Lord Auckland, the governor-general of India, and his two sisters took a trip "up the country" from Calcutta, they had at their disposal 60 horses, 140 elephants, 200 to 300 baggage camels, and "bullock carts without end." [1] They also had 12,000 camp followers. [2] The amount of campaign furniture that would have accompanied an officer and a gentleman such as Lord Auckland was on a scale worthy of the British Empire itself. As the nineteenth-century scientist and travel writer Sir Francis Galton (1822-1911) rightly observed:

The luxuries and elegances practicable in tent-life, are only limited by the means of transport. Julius Caesar, who was a great campaigner, carried parquets of wooden mojaic for hum floors! [3]

The campaign furniture of British officers during the Victorian period represented more than the comforts of home while abroad; it became a visual symbol of the splendor of the empire. Why, after all, should an officer in an empire befitting Caesar's not proclaim his identity as a conqueror in his dress and furniture?

Részletezését lásd a kérdés előző feltevésénél.