Nov 3, 2005 17:38
18 yrs ago
English term
PAN-1n
English to Italian
Medical
Medical: Instruments
referto
La frase è la seguente
Evidence of PAN-1n at pancreas margin (Schnellschnitt)
Nelle frasi precedenti descriveva cosa è stato asportato al paziente.
Evidence of PAN-1n at pancreas margin (Schnellschnitt)
Nelle frasi precedenti descriveva cosa è stato asportato al paziente.
Proposed translations
(Italian)
| 3 | metastasi linfonodali para-aortiche |
Gilberto Lacchia
|
| 3 +1 | PanIN(-1) |
Linda 969
|
Proposed translations
24 mins
Gilberto Lacchia
Italy
Italy
Native in Italian
Specializes in field
Italy
Medical translations by a medical doc
Native in: Italian
Works in: English to Italian, German to Italian
Related KudoZ points
:
140
Selected
metastasi linfonodali para-aortiche
È l'unica cosa che mi viene in mente; verifica che ci stia nel tuo contesto.
PAN paraaortic lymph node (PAN)
Il numero 1n potrebbe significare "1 linfonodo positivo " (1 node) diagnosticato con Schnellschnitt (perché in tedesco?), preparato rapido intraoperatorio.
"The extent of paraaortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis parellels that of distant metastases in patients with biliary carcinoma."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&d...
PAN paraaortic lymph node (PAN)
Il numero 1n potrebbe significare "1 linfonodo positivo " (1 node) diagnosticato con Schnellschnitt (perché in tedesco?), preparato rapido intraoperatorio.
"The extent of paraaortic lymph node (PAN) metastasis parellels that of distant metastases in patients with biliary carcinoma."
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&d...
2 KudoZ points awarded for this answer.
Comment: "Ti ringrazio moltissimo perché credo che sia proprio linfonodo paraaortico. Infatti più avanti nel testo avevo la frase Node at pancreas margin - free from tumour.
Quindi non so se si possa considerare una metastasi, ma sicuramente direi che è un nodulo paraaortico. Altra spiegazione non c'è. Sto comunque attendendo una risposta anche dal medico, per questo ho atteso un po' a dare la mia votazione. Grazie a tutti quelli che hanno risposto"
+1
1 hr
PanIN(-1)
potrebbe essere un typo per
*PanIN* = pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia => neoplasia intraepiteliale pancreatica
la sigla in italiano non cambia, ma non so se qui sia
PanIN
o
PanIN-1
More info:
http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin/
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs 48 mins (2005-11-03 23:27:24 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
avendo visto il contesto, aumento la confidence a 4
presumo si tratti di PanIN-1, senza grade non avrebbe molto senso indicarlo
Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 May;25(5):579-86.
Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions.
Hruban RH et al
Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts and ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and genetic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniformity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 microscopic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert pathologists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Kappa values for interobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than 70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In several cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from "hyperplasia," to "metaplasia," to "dysplasia," to "carcinoma in situ." This review therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classification system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologists agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology **pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN)** was selected, and diagnostic criteria for each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin). This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists rereview the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered, and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for **PanINs 1, 2, and 3** respectively. (...)
*PanIN* = pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia => neoplasia intraepiteliale pancreatica
la sigla in italiano non cambia, ma non so se qui sia
PanIN
o
PanIN-1
More info:
http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin/
--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 5 hrs 48 mins (2005-11-03 23:27:24 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------
avendo visto il contesto, aumento la confidence a 4
presumo si tratti di PanIN-1, senza grade non avrebbe molto senso indicarlo
Am J Surg Pathol. 2001 May;25(5):579-86.
Pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia: a new nomenclature and classification system for pancreatic duct lesions.
Hruban RH et al
Proliferative epithelial lesions in the smaller caliber pancreatic ducts and ductules have been the subject of numerous morphologic, clinical, and genetic studies; however, a standard nomenclature and diagnostic criteria for classifying these lesion have not been established. To evaluate the uniformity of existing systems for grading duct lesions in the pancreas, 35 microscopic slides with 35 representative duct lesions were sent to eight expert pathologists from the United States, Canada, and Europe. Kappa values for interobserver agreement could not be calculated initially because more than 70 different diagnostic terms were used by the eight pathologists. In several cases, the diagnoses rendered for a single duct lesion ranged from "hyperplasia," to "metaplasia," to "dysplasia," to "carcinoma in situ." This review therefore demonstrated the need for a standard nomenclature and classification system. Subsequently, during a working group meeting, the pathologists agreed to adopt a single standard system. The terminology **pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (or PanIN)** was selected, and diagnostic criteria for each grade of PanIN were established (http://pathology.jhu.edu/pancreas_panin). This new system was then evaluated by having the eight pathologists rereview the original 35 cases. Only seven different diagnoses were rendered, and kappa values of 0.43, 0.14, and 0.42 were obtained for **PanINs 1, 2, and 3** respectively. (...)
Discussion
Io mi sono basata piuttosto sulla sorta di riassunto riportato pi� avanti nel testo dove si diceva Node at pancreas margin - free from tumour, che mi sembrava fosse la ripetizione di questo PAN-1n at pancreas margin trovato all'estemporanea. Non so se i miei ragionamenti siano completamente giustificati, anche perch� purtroppo non ero presente alla dimissione, altrimenti avrei potuto chiedere direttamente. Ringrazio sia te che Linda di esservi impegnati ad aiutarmi. Francesca
Histology: Provisional Diagnosis: ypT4, ypN1 (17/34), Mo. Duodenal adenocarcinoma. Closing results give macroscopic evidence for a duodenal carcinoma. The differentiation pattern gives evidence for a pancreatic carcinoma. For that it is not clear to state of what origin the tumour is.
Macroscopic- 4.5 cm diameter polypoid tumour in the duodenum superior to the papilla with invasion of the papilla and pancreas.
Microscopic- Middle grade poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the duodenal mucosa with significant tumour necrosis and infiltration of the duodenal papilla, pancreas and peri-pancreatic fat. 16/24 regional lymph nodes involved. Perineural tumour propagation. All tissue margins free from tumour. Gallbladder-chronic cholecystitis. No evidence of tumour in the resected old jejunal roux-en-y loop or the accompanying jejunal mesenteric lymph nodes. ***Evidence of PAN-1n at pancreas margin (Schnell-schnit)
Quello che mi sembrerebbe strano � che i dottori hanno detto che non ci sono metastasi.
Schnellschnitt: il medico che ha redatto questa lettera � americano o australiano, ma l'ospedale che ha fatto l'intervento � tedesco. In effetti anche questo Schnellschnitt mi pone problemi.
Spero che mi possiate aiutare con queste indicazioni in pi�. Vi ringrazio tantissimo. Fra