nicht schwach schädigend

English translation: Slightly harmful

14:46 May 13, 2015
German to English translations [PRO]
Science - Science (general)
German term or phrase: nicht schwach schädigend
Das Mittel wird als nicht schwach schädigend für Populationen relevanter Raubmilben und Spinnen
eingestuft bei 2 Anwendungen. (NN2002)
Lorna O'Donoghue
Local time: 00:00
English translation:Slightly harmful
Explanation:
either: the "nicht" has nothing to do in this sentence see reference website where the product is described, or it is "either. .. or".
The website describe


Pflanzenschutzmittel Auflage NN2002 - Proplanta
www.proplanta.de/.../Hinweise_psm_Auflagen_Kennzeichnungste...
Einträgen 1 - 50 von 207 - NN2002: Das Mittel wird als schwach schädigend für Populationen relevanter Raubmilben und Spinnen eingestuft.
Selected response from:

Edith Kelly
Switzerland
Local time: 01:00
Grading comment
Many thanks to all. Think it was a typo.
4 KudoZ points were awarded for this answer



Summary of answers provided
3somewhat harmful
Lirka
1 +1Slightly harmful
Edith Kelly
Summary of reference entries provided
Initialtoxizität von Pflanzenschutzmitteln...aufgeteilt in vier Klassen
heidi (X)
nicht schwach schädigend - typo?
oa_xxx (X)
Labelling phrases for sustainable use/IPM
Johannes Gleim

Discussion entries: 3





  

Answers


2 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 1/5Answerer confidence 1/5 peer agreement (net): +1
Slightly harmful


Explanation:
either: the "nicht" has nothing to do in this sentence see reference website where the product is described, or it is "either. .. or".
The website describe


Pflanzenschutzmittel Auflage NN2002 - Proplanta
www.proplanta.de/.../Hinweise_psm_Auflagen_Kennzeichnungste...
Einträgen 1 - 50 von 207 - NN2002: Das Mittel wird als schwach schädigend für Populationen relevanter Raubmilben und Spinnen eingestuft.

Edith Kelly
Switzerland
Local time: 01:00
Works in field
Native speaker of: Native in GermanGerman, Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 20
Grading comment
Many thanks to all. Think it was a typo.

Peer comments on this answer (and responses from the answerer)
agree  Johannes Gleim: The NN2002 reference is convincing.
1 day 17 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

4 hrs   confidence: Answerer confidence 3/5Answerer confidence 3/5
somewhat harmful


Explanation:
with heidi

Lirka
Austria
Local time: 01:00
Specializes in field
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish
PRO pts in category: 4
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)




Reference comments


3 hrs peer agreement (net): +1
Reference: Initialtoxizität von Pflanzenschutzmitteln...aufgeteilt in vier Klassen

Reference information:
Initialtoxizität von Pflanzenschutzmitteln bei dem Eiparasiten Trichogramma cacoeceae aufgeteilt in vier Klassen: unschädlich, schwach schädigend, mittelstark schädigend, stark schädigend.
https://goo.gl/0X104L

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 3 hrs (2015-05-13 18:08:49 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Raubmilbenschädigung: I = nicht schädigend, II = schwach schädigend, III = schädigend
http://goo.gl/tYhcM8

heidi (X)

Peer comments on this reference comment (and responses from the reference poster)
agree  oa_xxx (X)
4 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

2 hrs peer agreement (net): +2
Reference: nicht schwach schädigend - typo?

Reference information:
usually: nicht schädigend or schwach schädigend

See p. 8 of the pdf from the BVI below:

"NN2002 The product is classified as slightly harmful for populations of relevant beneficial predatory mites and spiders."
This is obviously a translation but at least might clarify whether that "nicht" should be in there at all.

--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 2 hrs (2015-05-13 17:31:56 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

BVL of course ;)


--------------------------------------------------
Note added at 4 hrs (2015-05-13 18:51:51 GMT)
--------------------------------------------------

Didnt think of the "or" option:
P. 6
http://iobc-wprs.org/pub/general_assembly_2005/06_wg_benefic...

Classification of side effects to beneficial organisms
N = harmless or slightly harmful (Reduction 0-30% lab, 0-50% sf, f)
M = moderately harmful (Reduction 30-79% lab, 50-75% sf, f)
T = harmful (Reduction > 80% lab, > 75% sf, f)


    Reference: http://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Pflanzenschut...
oa_xxx (X)
Germany
Native speaker of: Native in EnglishEnglish

Peer comments on this reference comment (and responses from the reference poster)
agree  Armorel Young
13 mins
agree  writeaway
7 hrs
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)

1 day 20 hrs
Reference: Labelling phrases for sustainable use/IPM

Reference information:
NB6641 The product is classified as non-hazardous to bees, even when the maximum application rate, or concentration if no application rate is stipulated, as stated for authorisation is applied. (B4)
NN1001 The product is classified as non-harmful for populations of relevant beneficial insects.
NN2002 The product is classified as slightly harmful for populations of relevant beneficial predatory mites and spiders.
WMO Mode of Action (HRAC-Group): O WMK1 Mode of Action (HRAC-Group): K1
http://www.bvl.bund.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/04_Pflanzenschut...

Johannes Gleim
Works in field
Native speaker of: German
PRO pts in category: 4
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade)



Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.

You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.

KudoZ™ translation help

The KudoZ network provides a framework for translators and others to assist each other with translations or explanations of terms and short phrases.


See also:
Term search
  • All of ProZ.com
  • Term search
  • Jobs
  • Forums
  • Multiple search