20:39 May 23, 2019 |
French to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Philosophy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Adrian MM. Austria | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +1 | ordinalism and cardinalism in microeconomics |
| ||
4 | ordinal and cardinal utility in micro-economics |
|
ordinalism and cardinalism in microeconomics Explanation: See https://www.jstor.org/stable/30034333?seq=1#page_scan_tab_co... and many other sites that discuss ordinalism and cardinalism. |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
ordinal and cardinal utility in micro-economics Explanation: Surely, this is about ordinal > preferential vs. cardinal > utility value in micro-economics. The g/hits argument could be a 'cardinal' logical fallacy in this case, as that utilitarian Jeremy Bentham might have postulated. Example sentence(s):
Reference: http://www.economicshelp.org/blog/glossary/cardinal-utility/ |
| ||
Notes to answerer
| |||
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.