12:27 Nov 16, 2017 |
French to English translations [PRO] Social Sciences - Philosophy | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Marco Solinas Local time: 16:16 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
Summary of answers provided | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 +4 | the reasoning is sound |
| ||
4 | the outcome is good |
| ||
3 | the result is good |
|
Discussion entries: 8 | |
---|---|
the result is good Explanation: * |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
the outcome is good Explanation: http://www.csrnyc.com/philosophicalbaseofcsr/fourtypesofethi... "Consequentialist or teleological ethics abandons the criterion of motive and focuses attention on the outcomes of actions. If the outcome is good the related actions are likely to be good – regardless of the motivation of the individual actor. The fact that someone has good motives for an act is not enough to ensure that it is ethically good." http://jehdnet.com/journals/jehd/Vol_3_No_4_December_2014/31... 'The importance of the “question” lies in examining the relationship between actions and outcomes. It has a purpose and refers deeds to their outcomes. If the outcome is good, then the deed is also good, and vice versa. Socrates tries to shed doubt on the result of teaching virtues, as he is not satisfied with Protagoras' answer. "If you associate with me, young man, then you will be able at the end of your first day in my company, to go away a better man and the same will happen on the next day, and each day after that you will continue to grow better and improve."' |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
the reasoning is sound Explanation: Please see discussion box. Katsy and Charles have explained it very well. I think the sentence refer to the deduction process. |
| |
Grading comment
| ||