08:32 Nov 24, 2009 |
English language (monolingual) [Non-PRO] Art/Literary - Printing & Publishing | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Tony M France Local time: 22:57 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
5 +4 | Nothing missing |
|
Discussion entries: 2 | |
---|---|
Preface to the English edition 2009 Nothing missing Explanation: No, it's perfectly correct as it stands. -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 11 mins (2009-11-24 08:44:16 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- Even though we might read it as meaning 'the edition published in English in 2009', the way it is expressed in your source text is perfectly natural, normal English. Of course, your other suggestions are also viable ways of expressing it, but the original is probably the commonest. |
| ||
Grading comment
| |||
Notes to answerer
| |||