covering
English translation: had roof on
| GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 22:34 Aug 23, 2016 |
| English language (monolingual) [PRO] Science - Nuclear Eng/Sci | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
|  Selected response from: Didier Fourcot Local time: 21:28 | ||||||
Grading comment
| |||||||
| SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 +3 | had roof on |
| ||
| 4 +2 | building walls still intact |
| ||
| 3 -1 | responsible for |
|
Answers
24 mins confidence: 
peer agreement (net): -1
peer agreement (net): -1responsible for Explanation: that's the way I read it -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 25 mins (2016-08-23 23:00:03 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- but not too much to go on so... |
| |
| Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) | ||
10 hrs confidence: peer agreement (net): +3
peer agreement (net): +3had roof on Explanation: Unit 2 reactor building had not had its roof blown away by hydrogen explosion, so the roof did prevent spraying water into the pool from above This assumes that you are still working oin the Fukushima Daichi accident, see this report describing the helicopters used to drop water onto the spent fuel pools of buildings 3 and 4, with "building housing reactor No. 2 was "slightly damaged"": http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/nuclear-fuel-fukus... Full timeline with hydrogen explosions and photos of the roofless buuilding 1, etc: http://www.scientificamerican.com/media/multimedia/0312-fuku... |
| |
