GLOSSARY ENTRY (DERIVED FROM QUESTION BELOW) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
09:33 Apr 7, 2013 |
English language (monolingual) [PRO] Bus/Financial - Insurance / experts | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||
| Selected response from: Yvonne Gallagher Ireland Local time: 02:21 | ||||||
Grading comment
|
SUMMARY OF ALL EXPLANATIONS PROVIDED | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
4 | split=different methods (functionalities ) used to assess claims |
|
split of claim assessment functionalities split=different methods (functionalities ) used to assess claims Explanation: imo -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 10 mins (2013-04-07 09:43:42 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- the problem is that these methods or functionalities are not completely integrated or working together as it says after "multiple (many) applicationS with poor (weak) integration capabilities" previously it has said what good claims assessment should be: Middle layer technology used to integrate front end and back end applications -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 11 mins (2013-04-07 09:44:09 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- last line in "..." -------------------------------------------------- Note added at 13 mins (2013-04-07 09:46:52 GMT) -------------------------------------------------- and the best practice or best way of doing things is: where the handling process is integrated with support to improve quality "BEST PRACTICE CLAIMS function owns the claims handling process as well as the quality enhancing support functions" several spelling errors here as well |
| |
Login to enter a peer comment (or grade) |
Login or register (free and only takes a few minutes) to participate in this question.
You will also have access to many other tools and opportunities designed for those who have language-related jobs (or are passionate about them). Participation is free and the site has a strict confidentiality policy.